Sunday, 28 February 2010


Hello again folks! As promised on Tuesday 23-Feb-2010 and following on from my previous blog in this series []; here is the text of the cited article in the 'Christian Voice' magazine; November 2009 issue; pages 8 &13. It has taken one-finger Sinclair absolutely ages to type this one. Please excuse any sgellinp maskeist:


It is the early 1990's, The World Health Organization, working under the control of the UN, has just launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of people in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines against tetanus. Tetanus is a potentially lethal infection caused by external wounds or cuts from things like rusty nails. There is nothing unusual in tetanus inoculations, which are routine in the Western World. But there is something that doesn't quite add up about these particular vaccinations. For one thing, the WHO is choosing only to vaccinate females. For another thing, the girls they are choosing to vaccinate are primarily those between the ages of 15 and 45 [in Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.] It wasn't just disease experts who noticed that something was amiss. After all, it doesn't take a great deal of intelligence to know that men and boys are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than ladies. So why is the WHO only choosing to vaccinate girls of child-bearing age? To make matters more suspicious, the vaccination protocols are calling for multiple injections - three within three months and a total of five altogether. However, tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, so why this call for multiple inoculations? These were the questions that Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, began asking and why they decided to have some vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the tetanus vaccine contained human chorionic gonadotrophin [nCG]. hCG is a natural hormone that is secreted during the initial stages of pregnancy. When this hormone is combined with the tetanus toxoid carrier, it tricks the body into thinking that hCG is an invading enemy, with the result that a woman's body begins producing anti-hCG antibodies, making it impossible for her to ever maintain a pregnancy. After a number of labs exposed what the vaccine really was [a lime-time birth control shot], WHO officials tried to keep things quiet and continue administering the anti-fertility injections. It was only after the courts intervened that the WHO was forced to stop administering the vaccine. Unfortunately, by then the damage had already been done and thousands of girls in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines had been rendered infertile.

Was the 1990's tetanus scandal simply a medical blunder? Hardly. For 20 years prior to the incident, WHO researchers had been actively involved increating anti-fertility vaccines using hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier. This was publically documented in medical journals from the 70's through to the 90's. What could possibly have motivated the WHO toknowingly, but covertly, sterilize thousands of women in third-world countries? One does need to resort to conspiracy theories to answer this question, since a myriad of public figures, lawmakers and bankers have all stated publically that the world's population of human beings need to be drastically reduced. Consider that:

* In an interview with the New York Times, Supreme Justice Ginsburg alluded to the fact that abortion is all about getting rid of certain types of people we do not want around: "Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth andparticularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
* Echoing comments made by the Optimum Population Trust in 2007, the London School of Economics recently suggested that the best way to cobat global warming is to reduce the surplus population through contraception and abortion. [Their logic is simple: more people = more polluters.] Similarly, a 2007 report, written by specialist Professor Barry Walters for the Australian medical journal, calls for couples with more than two children to be charged a lifelong tax to offset their extra offspring's carbon dioxide emmisions. Parents to be charged $5,000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to $800.
* In its Autumn 2009 edition [Issue 10], Salvo magazine reported that the United Nations Population Fund [UNFPA] has come up with a new way to reduce poverty: reduce poor people. The campaign, which has been supported by Bill Gates, does so by supporting and funding coercive sterilization, contraception and abortion campaigns.
* In a 1981 interview, Thomas Ferguson of the State Department Office of Population Affairs said, "We must reduce poulation levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it ..."
* Population control seems to be the pet topic among those men who control much of the world's health. Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Ted Turner have all spoken publically in favour of drastically reducing the human species, and supported programs designed to eliminate the excess in babies. For example, in 1996, Ted Turner stated that, "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
* College professors and leaders frequently cite the Georgia Guidestones in arguing that we should "maintain humanity under 500,000 in perpetual balance with nature." To achieve that, the human population would have to be thinned by 90%.
* The Anglo-Dutch financial empire has been and still is committed to reducing the world's population to under 2 billion persons. This has been stated repeatedly in the post-war period by such leading spokesmen as Lord Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley,  and World Wildlife Fund founders Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and the still-living Prince Philip, who has reiterated many times his desire to see the human population thinned.
* Robert McNamara of the World Bank has said, "Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world."
* Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 Earth Charter reads, "The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary."
* Dr. Henry Kissinger has said, "World population needs to be decreased by 50%."
* Friends of the Earth founder, David Brower, has stated, "That's the first thing to do, start controlling the population in affluent white America, where a child born to a white American will use about fifty times the resources of a child born in the black ghetto." "Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government licence ... All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidores to citizens chosen for childbearing."
* President Obama's top science and technology advisor, John P. Holdren, has advocated the possibility of a "planetary regime" that would use a "global police force" to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. [Sources for all of these quotations can be found at:]

When you have a team with as much money and power as the above persons and organizations, many of whom have direct links to the UN and the WHO, it doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to begin connecting the dots. Given that the WHO clearly knew and understood the implications of the tetanus vaccine, it would be naive not to view it in the context of the above agendas. The traditional methods of cultural sterilization [encouraging abortion, birth controlm and negative attitudes toward children] are simply not getting the job done, as the world's population is continuing to grow, rather than shrink. Neither can they rely on plagues to accomplish the task, because the human race is simply not as vunerable to plagues as they were in past centuries, thanks to sanitation, insect control, and fresh vegetables to eat all winter. While there are viruses like ebola and bird flu that are highly virulent, they are not very infectious, while the viruses that are highly infectious, like the common cold and regular flu, are not very virulent and kill less than 1%. There have been no viruses for a long time that are both highly infectious and highly virulent. Similarly, they cannot rely on war to accomplish the task. "War has hitherto been disappointing" in its capacity to reduce the world's population, complained Lord Bertrand Russell back in 1953. In short, the only way to eliminate 90% of the world population is to either inject them with a deadly disease, or toxin, or to inject them with a sterilizing agent. But this would be highly unpopular. Although those with money and power would like to see a decrease in the "surplus population", there are very few who would respond favourably to the Malthusian measures that Obama's science advisor has suggested may be necessary and which China has been enforcing. This means that population control will have to be enforced, not by a direct policy, but by stealth. And that is exactly what happened in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

The Nicaragua/Mexico/Philippines tetanus vaccine is not the only vaccine that impairs fertility. Dr. Richard A. Fayrer-Hosken at the University of Georgia invented a vaccine with the expressed purpose of impairing fertility. Administered by a simple shot, the result is a lifetime of sterility.It has been found to be effective on all the mammals on which it has been tested. According to information from the patent [a link to which can be found at the above website], the active ingredients of this sterilization vaccine are primarily antigens from porcine [pig] glyco-proteins bonded with a powerful oil-in-water "adjuvant" called squalene. The squalene is emulsified in Tween 80 for an adjuvant. In his article "Immunisterilization in Humans: A 2009 Vaccination Odyssey", A. True ott, PhD, ND, draws our attention to the fact that Novartis' master patent for the "swine flu" vaccine [which is also publically available and can be read at the above link] similarly utilizes swine [porcine] glycol-proteins bonded with a powerful oil-in-water "adjuvant" called squalene. According to Novartis' parent, the Squalene in the vaccine is emulsified in Tween 80 for an adjuvant, as it also is in the sterilization vaccine. The chemical similarity between the swine flu vaccine abd Dr. Fayrer-Hosken's sterilization vaccine is too similar to dismiss as mere coincidence. The combination of these proteins can activate the human immune system to produce antigens or antibodies corresponding to the protein peptides, or polypeptides. These antibodies in turn will in turn seek and destroy the naturally-occurring similar proteins or peptides which can be either the swine flu virus or human reproductive hormones. By injecting squalene/Tween 80 polysorbate into the human body, the swine flu vaccine could trigger the human immune system to generate antibodies which will destroy hormonal peptides of the human host. The end result could be infertility in [the] male or female human body. Notice I say "could be." None of this has yet been proved. But given the WHO's track record, it seems reasonable that our operating assumption should be one of suspicion. Finally, consider that section 8.1 of the product information circular on the Novartis' 'swine flu' vaccine contains the following warning: "It is also not known whether the vaccine ... can affect reproduction capacity." I, for one, will not be getting any of my children vaccinated." [end quote]

There you have it. An awful lot of information that ultimately you need to check out for your good selves. The seeds and indeed the fruit of population control are those very things that I have warned about for some time [as have others]. Those 'things' include world government; population control on a global scale [a la China] but enforced much more severely; global taxes; forced implants to prevent fertility [that may also be on a par with the 'dreaded 'Mark of the Beast'] i.e. no-one can buy or sell or have children or dissent their leader without odedience and credits etc. The list goes on. Although I strongly disapprove of the bad language, the film: "Children of Men" comes to mind here.

If I were you I would re-read the above article on another day and then consider it. That the NWO/Illuminati want a population collapse is in no doubt. It's a case of how and when. The best road map through these perilous times is the Word of God. Deception is the name of the game in these dark days. Real Bereans [Acts 17:11] are truly needed; watchmen must warn; evangelists must compel; DO NOT BE DECEIVED and watch that periphery!

God bless you and God bless Israel ... Keith JS ... 28-Feb-2010

No comments: